The Big Debate:
An interesting conversation ensued after the AGM last Friday night around the refreshments table. The questions was posed, "How do I write an artist's statement?" The first artist to respond answered with the idea that an artist's statement is found by searching within yourself and discovering why you create the work that you create.
This is a great place to begin, I guess, and certainly if you have some idea of the message you are trying to get across with your art, it is probably pretty straightforward. However, this is perhaps not so simple to answer if your artwork is just art for art's sake, and no deeply profound message is trying to be portrayed.
This leads on to further questions, "Does art always have to be making a statement, or have some deeper meaning? Is it really art if it is purely aesthetic?"
This is where the conversation around the table became rather divided. Some say that creating an artist's statement can lead to artists creating a fake mishmash of gobbledegook just to say that their art has some hidden meaning, when it may not really. Others argued that
all art has meaning and it is just a matter of searching.
Personally, I find that creating art for me often has no hidden or profound meaning, it is just the act of creating something that gives me pleasure and the subjects I choose are purely based on an aesthetic quality that I enjoy. Writing an artist's statement for me is quite a painful exercise because I feel like it forces me to become something fake by making up meaning that isn't actually intended or true, and thus making me a liar. Does this mean that my artwork isn't truly art? Or is the idea of an artist's statement something else? Is it merely a tool to help the viewer understand what they are looking at? If this is the case, is is really necessary for figurative art?
What are your opinions? Let us know what you think about the artist's statemtent debate...